Let me take the example of NSEJS first. The numbers
have swallowed since the first list declared by IAPT to final list declared by
HBCSE. For Example in NSEJS there were 17 students who were not present in the
first list released by IAPT. Out of which some students are last year awardees
which is understood, but rest of the students did not figure out in the first
list released by IAPT. It has done some adjustments and the number of
selections has increased after that. This has been done in a very silent way
and IAPT and HBCSE in tight lipped about this increased no of students. This
has been done in every Olympiad. It is time these people should be taken to
court for doing things at their whims and fancies. There could be reasons for
this.
1. 1.
There could be some deserving candidates who
protested when there were not selected on rechecking it was found that the
mistake was from IAPT.( if you have not protested then you have no chance)
2. 2.
Some students would have selected to oblige some
body.
3. 3.
IAPT and HBCSE have their own different measures
of selecting the candidates after all tests are done.
IAPT and HBCSE are duty bound to come with explanation for
each candidate who wwas not there in the first released by IAPT.
Even I understand the same,
ReplyDelete- Previous Awardees, when are not allowed to appear in next same international olympiad, then why they are allowed to play the game with this examination. And if this is for Jr Astro then also why to confuse with the Junior science. The name may be released directly with the roll numbers.
- surprisingly hbcse releases roll numbers with names and later when result is released for OCSC, they only give Roll numbers and hide names, - Hmmmm.
- Why roll numbers are not released right now this time as per usual practice - is there still a "hope" to get roll numbers clandestinely.
- some of the students have been shown under 40% mark that is 100 marks out of 240 in the list whereas as per their brochure a minimal cutoff criteria was clearly given, is being washed off here, reasons unknown to me may be "discrition".
- Above all when the entire list of highest marks and cutoff is given here then it is impossible to understand why "Individuals marks are sent to centre i/c as per usual practice" and why not here to make this easier for students. Broadly I have not met with any of the students getting his marks by center in-charge under the pretext - "Not received yet ask iapt" or "we are busy with exams heading" and then nothing ever. And on approaching iapt they say ask your centre head / coordinator we have sent them.
- Also because of this ( not giving marks here or informing students directly or at least when IAPT people are sending details to center i/c ) students never know when to approach centre i/c and can never know exactly if he is eligible for 1% state topper or National topper certificate - may be discretion again.
I really feel sorry for the students for this.
All this make me feel if I am still alive?
For sure there is something inverted between "INVERTED" commas.
wake up man you office bearer people are getting enough, it is not at all required to become reason to depress young kids. Also what these students will inherit from you for their next generation, when they will be on similar chairs in forthcoming years...... please give this a little thought.....